A SOLUTION TO THE IRAQ WAR

A SOLUTION TO THE IRAQ WAR.

Greetings Readers, and as always, God Bless.
I have told a few people that this blog is up, and already people have asked me “Ok Mr. Correct Views, you are President of The Grand US of A….how do you handle Iraq?”
Plans to address that were on the table, after all this is the major issue of our time, still the readership is so very small that until it grows in this regard it seemed like a waste and that perhaps it was better to wait a bit until The Correct Views has grown some. After careful debate I have decided that there is no law saying that it can not be reposted yet (Congress will make one perhaps, so check before you take my word for it), so why not just address it. Fine, but there had better be some comments on it, I am playing my ace card a bit early….
but every deck has four aces, six if you play the jokers right.
Ok – Iraq. Let us forget before we begin “This war was right” and “This war was utter rubbish” and pretend that Mr. Samuel Di Gangi was elected today - as is- into the house of the blue dress and that now Iraq was up to “Mr. Correct Views” as I was called.
First of all, Iraq is split in threes: Kurds, Sunni, and Shiite. NO QUESTIONS ASKED.
Secondly, we take every healthy solider and place an equal (?) number in all three countries. If the solider is supposed to be sent home, he will be offered double pay for staying. If the solider chooses to not stay and is up to go home, he goes home. Again, NO QUESTIONS ASKED.
Point three would address the time table, and this is where I must confess that I am not solid on this, for I am not a general, so I do not pretend to be one. I would however surround myself with the best, brightest, most diverse minds in modern warfare and military know how (not just a handful of “yes-men”) to guide me in that decision. That is the best that I can say.
The fourth issue would involve civil war because I am not going to assume as President that they will all like the new sandbox and play nicely with one another. The troops are split into all three counties according to the layout of above mentioned military minds and myself, and then we begin “testing”. It would not be called “testing”, but whatever fancy title my spinsters gave to it, in the end it would boil down to testing. Issue four is handled as follows: Each country would have all of the forces that the USA and whatever poor allies we still have can offer, and they MUST build a force of police and military for themselves, and they must do it YESTERDAY! If they are building their forces, our help stays and helps. If on the other hand, a country falls into violence and chaos, then we will in fact LEAVE. Yes, we will LEAVE THEM because the people are NOT able or willing to police and defend themselves, they are not showing signs of unity, and we are not their country. We leave, for how often have we all heard the mantra that most of the Muslim faith is peaceful and able? Fine, that country will either unite and be so able or they can deal with the lack of unity. The innocents will have to rise up and not be bullied by the government that they elect. If they squander our help, they will loose it. What more can we give them?
To the government that did build, again, we help them defend any attacks from the other two, but not forever. Much of this will do with size and population.
Five is terrible. Five is why a lot of people may leave nasty messages for me in The Correct Views comment section because in the event that say the new Sunni country builds to such a degree that they are attacking the Kurds, the Shiite, and threatening the USA and Israel, then we act fast, with great force, and we leave. Gone.
Then we call the Air Force because the aggressor country must be attacking from somewhere. Let’s assume that the aggressive country had a handful of long or semi-long range weapons that we have picked up on satellite images, but other than that it seemed to be centered on the border of the people they are attacking with more conventional short range weapons. As President, I would order our jets to level the entire area that is attacking its neighbor. Any site that had larger weapons would have nothing but a pile of ash when the attack was done, not a missile tower any longer. I would order the whole section blasted to the point to where the other countries could then defend themselves proper from a future attack and they would be able to do it because of us.
Now…
All I ask is that if you, the faithful reader decide to send angry comments, I ask that you lay out where The Correct View is wrong. (or just rip me a new one, I don’t mind really).