Greetings to You The Faithful Reader,
After giving to you my idea for the solving (at least in greater detail than I have heard anyone else offer) the Iraq issue, it has been decided that this column should now SEEK the ideas and details of others in the political world. So to do just that, The Correct Views will spend the next few weeks seeing just what questions and views are in the heads of our politicians, radio hosts, and bloggers from the questions that The Correct Views will send to them.
It is simple. The Correct Views sends a small number of questions to any given person of interest and a fair amount of time is given for a response or reply. When the reply is given, The Correct Views will post the answers AS GIVEN with NO CHANGE to so much as a single TYPO! NOTHING WILL BE ALTERED, EDITED, or CHANGED...of this you have my word as my reader. For proof of my honesty, you may read my music related interviews at http://passingtime.ods.org where I have interviewed both in person and via the net some the most cutting edge musicians who have ever lived, and they all found me fair and easy to work with.
There are currently seven questions that have just been sent to radio talk show host Alex Jones. Look for a list of either a) his answers in his OWN WORDS or b) a list of the questions that he refused to answer. In any event, after that, The Correct Views will choose another person. Yes, I would like to know who you would like to see asked what questions, so let me know.
Thanks for reading.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Alex Jones? You are starting the series with Alex Jones, the most controversial of all of radio, then what are you going to follow that up with? You should have chosen someone less aggressive and over the top to begin and worked up for that. Nothing can follow Alex Jones.
Still, I would like to know what he said and what you asked of him.
Are you going to ask Hillary anything, I want to know if her Iraq position this week.
Bill From Phil
Greeting Bill,
A death in my family has kept me from my blog, and here you are still ever loyal. Thanks Bill.
I choose those who stimulate me, and Alex does. I don't know what I think of everything he says yet, but I do find myself asking some strong questions at this point.
As for Hillary, I don't like her much and will NOT LIE about it. However, she will get the same fair treatment when she gets her questions as my own mother would get because I want me readers to trust me. I will not bias that piece in any way, of that I swear.
Lastly, who can follow Alex Jones? Well, even if he tells me that I would be "selling bras in his day", Micheal Savage should be a real counter punch, no? You see, I am NEVER out of options.
Sam
THANKS FOR READING
Before I say anything else... I would like to know, why you dont like Hillary and what you base that dislike on.
What policies she has, that you dont agreee with and such?
Hello! I like "Let's Talk"s blog, and found you there. While I tend to be leftist, driven farther to the left than before Bush took office due to what I view as Bush's trampling of the Constitution, I can understand various political views. I'm a Green who tends to vote for whatever candidate I feel can beat the Republican candidate, although if a character issue bothers me enough, I'll vote for a right-winger over a Dem or a Green. I'm a rarity, that is, a gun-owning lefty. I tend to place high priority on the Constitution above what the president thinks or says about it. What drives me the most nuts about Bush is that he is violating the Constitution, he doesn't care, and the country doesn't seem angry enough about it to do anything to stop him.
Anyway, I don't care for Hillary Clinton and I hope above hope that she can't buy the Democratic nomination. As it is now, a lot of the religious conservatives don't feel they have a candidate they can support, but if Hillary runs, they will come to the polls to vote against her. I think someone like Obama or Edwards (or my preference, Richardson) would have a much better chance at getting elected because they tend to incite less hostile reactions in people than Hillary does.
I would guess Hillary would make a halfway decent presidential candidate if she was able to articulate her views effectively. To me, it seems like she puts her finger in her mouth, then holds it up in the air to see from which way the wind is blowing. Because the wind doesn't always blow from the same direction, she tends to say things that conflict with other things she has said, and like her husband, she tries to be all things to all people. I think he had the charisma to get elected despite that, I don't think she has that kind of charisma.
I like Richardson because I think he IS the most experienced candidate the left has to offer, particularly when it comes to foreign relations. At a time when I think our country desperately needs to re-learn the art of diplomacy, Richardson would help heal many of the open sores the Bush administration has created. He also has enough federal and state government experience that I believe he would make an excellent administrator. The fact that he is Hispanic might also provide some appeal to the burgeoning Hispanic population of the American Southwest, which our nation needs to acknowledge whether people like it or not. I think he is the right man for the times, but I fear he isn't rich enough to get the nomination. I would love to see him debate Hillary one-on-one... I think he would slaughter her in a debate.
Hello Lets Talk,
Ok, Mrs. Clinton.
First off, she is not in favor of the tax breaks. Were they for the rich? To some degree yes, but she is going to raise taxes I fear quite a bit.
Secondly, I don't mind a parent taking his taxes to give to another school,such as private, she will not let a parent do that.
Third, she actually is dull enough in the head to believe in MAN MADE global warming. There is a slippery slope to a Global tax when man has NOTHING to do with the tempature.
More? She is anti-Anwar drilling, and I feel it is needed. She signed the HORRIBLE Patriot Act and even most true conservatives hate it, and she is a United Nations supporter. (EVERYONE knows the UN hates us, and some of us wish we were NOT in it).
She supports drugs courts which will make everyones life hell - the war on drugs is an invasion of privacy, yet she wants to ban FLAG BURNING! She supports gun laws that are really infringments on the rights to OWN certain weapons, and she wants to ban certain video games. This is NOT liberal, this is facist.
This is just off the top of my head.
THANKS FOR READING!
Sam
Greetings,
HEY SNAVE - I LOVE THE ERASERHEAD PIC! We are using it on a flyer at my band page.... www.myspace.com/passingtimeband.
Thanks for reading. I answered your posting in what I penned to LETS TALK.
Sam
Dan Reese (best friend of Sam) had an idea that is not related to this post, but in a move of artistic liberty, Sam has allowed the following to see print. This is Dan's idea:
I believe that once a month each major city should gather at the same precise time in a large hall that is electronicly connected to the president and his staff.This forum would let each major city direct a certan amount of questions to the staff and experts from around the globe to adress situations such as midlle east conflict and our involvement.
Post a Comment