Introduction To: The Correct Views

Greetings One and All,
I bid thee welcome my new blog, The Correct Views. My name is Samuel E. Di Gangi, and most people know me from my music (Bobby and The Men, Jaws of Victory, and currently Passing Time) with various bands and from live stand in's at various clubs, colleges, andyes - I also own Sam R I Web Design, Writing, Graphics, and Music Services. I have a degree in Graphic Design and a degree soon in Web Design and Music Theory, MIDI, and Production.
Those who know my work also know that I have ALWAYS been political. My music, my art, and my speech have always danced about with declarations of what I have come to know as The Correct Views.
The blogs posted here will not be music related to the degree that they will be political. I have and will still write a plethora of music related material, but little of it will be posted here UNLESS it is somehow political as well. Now, rather than introduce myself further, I shall let myself simply post a blog outlining my view of the main political parties in this country at this time. If I get a ready, strong response to these blogs, I shall post them with great frequency. If I get a slow, tired response, this may be one of the only posts I give.
Now let me begin, and thank you for reading....
REPUBLICANS: The war in Afghanastan was needed. It is obvious to the strongest of degrees that George Bush Sr. had no business trying to beat Bill Clinton to the pink flag so quickly that he left the war and job undone in Gulf War One. He needed to rid Saddam when he had the whole world on our side and he chose to race instead.
Likewise, Bill Clinton allowed not one attack, but TWO ATTACKS upon the US (World Trade Center attack one and The SS Cole) and did nothing to defend the country. What other president in American History would have allowed that? This empowered the mouse to emerge from it's hole and it hurt the United States.
Iraq....The Correct View is a bit more complicated in this regard, but here it is. Saddam allowed Al Zaquari safe haven in Iraq, and Al Zarquari was the sworn enemy of the US. He planned attacks upon the USA and he did so from Iraq. However, while the correct view is that Saddam needed to be removed for this (should have long been removed), George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld have done a dreadful, mind blowingly bad job of it! As someone who supported Bush over Kerry (Bush was honest about his ideas that we all hated, Kerry lied about everthing...what a choice, no?), it can not be overstated that Geroge Bush may just have made the most dreadful decision to go into this war with Donald Rumsfeld.
Ruddy offers some hope, he is pretty much a JFK liberal and that is not all bad. There is a concern here about his strong arm tactics in NYC that did clean up that city well, but if attempted nationally it could lead to police strong arming your teenager with a joint in their pocket to a degree that ruins their life forever with mandatory minimums. I do fear he would be that strict, and other than that, he seems to be a decent enough option, though not perect.
McCain would sink the party. His "if I gave $50 an hour to anyone in this room to pick lettuce" comment was rooted firmly on nothing , andyet he still managed to hang himself from it. He would be a travisty.
Mitt who? He needs to run to get his name out, but never. Maybe next time.

DEMOCRATS: When did someone decide that todays liberals were....um...liberal? This is the new party spread from the censorship left of the late 80's (remember The PMRC were so strict as to ban a wet t-shirt on the Bon Jovi CD "Slippery When Wet" as obscene. Bon Jovi....obscene???) lead by Tipper Gore...aka Mrs. Al Gore. This is the roots of this party right now. The want to ban guns, cars, energy....everything the country runs on.
Hillary is a tax maniac and this glossing over of what her and her husband did is nauseating, and I am not speaking of the sex act.
It was Bill Clinton who allowed nuclear tade secrets to leak to the countries that now want to show us how well they all work, just to say thanks and all. He should have faced a hangman's noose for that act. Millions of people may perish due to that one act, so no: no Clintons.
Ubama. He is new, fresh faced, and while he has perhaps an election to run before he may win, he is showing strong with Democrats (39% up from 34% last year) who would "never vote for Mrs. Clinton." He seems strong on a lot of issues, and if he chooses to be himself and not act black or act white, he will show strong in the polls not only amoung African Americans, but also among the "Colin Powell" right as well.
Lastly....GIVE UP THE GLOBAL WARMING LIE! For one, the science is NOT in, and while it is obvious that world is warming up, many (myself thus far included) does NOT find any evidence that man is causing increase in tempature. This seems to be an attempt upon the far left to levy a new tax (perhaps global) on everything that uses any energy. Now, if they were to say "we need to limit the amount of toxins in our air" and not fingered the SUV as a problem (which it is NOT at all in terms of warming), then perhaps it would or will work for them. People know a lie when they see it, this WILL COST YOU THE ELECTION no matter how many times Al Gore shines his trophy. As a health risk (lung cancer for instance) people will perhaps limit and work with "The Establishment", but if taxed or lied to about global warming....well - say hello to President Ruddy.

LIBERTARIAN: What has happened to my party? As God alive see's, so proud was I to be a Libertarian! Now what do you believe? Well, Mr Badnarick as his platform desired to pull all troops from Iraq in 6 months if he were to elected President. Even if oneare hates the war, even if one has hated the war from the first time a talking head told of it, one has to see that this would be a bloodbath. It does not matter if one feels that Bush made the worst blunder in recorded history even, one must also see that a pull out like that would kill thousands. That has to be one of the worst ideas in recorded history right there.
And health care. This is where The Correct View and the Libertarian Party part company. The correct view is that while the private sector does 99.9% of things better than any government can do, it is true that greed kills. The market can price the cheese, for if it goes up too high the sales stop. This does NOT work for healthcare because one can not choose to NOT be sick if it is so ordained. Cancer comes no matter how much money you have or do not have.
A sick society, an ill society is not a safe nor productive society. Sick people equeal a sick nation at some point. A sick populace can breed an epidemic as well, and this can stop and econmy cold (think SARS). The government must insure the populace so that big business does not stifle the health of the nation. The government must oversee very few things, but again The Correct View states clearly that the health of the nation does fall under "Protecting the nation" as outlined in the Constitution.

Now that you have seen my views, I hope to hear from you, the reader.